<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>IPO fund diversion charges: Dismissed case can&#039;t revive, fresh filing allowed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81279</link>
    <description>Criminal court lacks inherent power to revive dismissed complaint. Filing fresh complaint allowed, not recalling dismissed one. IPO fund diversion allegation under Companies Act 2013 Sections 447/448. Order restoring dismissed complaint quashed as lacking jurisdiction under Supreme Court precedent. Consequential proceedings set aside. Petition allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2024 08:31:05 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2024 08:31:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>IPO fund diversion charges: Dismissed case can&#039;t revive, fresh filing allowed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81279</link>
      <description>Criminal court lacks inherent power to revive dismissed complaint. Filing fresh complaint allowed, not recalling dismissed one. IPO fund diversion allegation under Companies Act 2013 Sections 447/448. Order restoring dismissed complaint quashed as lacking jurisdiction under Supreme Court precedent. Consequential proceedings set aside. Petition allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2024 08:31:05 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>