https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758382 The NCLAT dismissed the appeal against the NCLT order dated 5th April 2024, which denied the restoration of the company petition initially dismissed due to incomplete information from the appellant. The Tribunal affirmed that the recall application was impermissible under Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules, as no appeal was filed against the original order dated 20th December 2023. The appellant's ill health was insufficient to justify the recall, and the Tribunal found no grounds such as lack of jurisdiction or fraud to warrant recalling the order. The decision underscored adherence to proper legal procedures in challenging orders. en-us Fri, 06 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:30:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758382 The NCLAT dismissed the appeal against the NCLT order dated 5th April 2024, which denied the restoration of the company petition initially dismissed due to incomplete information from the appellant. The Tribunal affirmed that the recall application was impermissible under Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules, as no appeal was filed against the original order dated 20th December 2023. The appellant's ill health was insufficient to justify the recall, and the Tribunal found no grounds such as lack of jurisdiction or fraud to warrant recalling the order. The decision underscored adherence to proper legal procedures in challenging orders. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 06 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758382