<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Insolvency sale upheld despite allegations, purchaser&#039;s delay condoned with additional payment.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81277</link>
    <description>Liquidator&#039;s discretion in fixing reserve price upheld. COVID-19 lockdown considered valid reason for extension to deposit balance sale consideration. Allegation of undervaluation rejected as appellant failed to bring higher bidders despite opportunities. Non-constitution of Stakeholders&#039; Consultation Committee not violative due to clarificatory explanation. Regulation 33 considered directory, Adjudicating Authority&#039;s extension of time justified under extraordinary circumstances. Attachment order no ground to deny balance payment, purchaser&#039;s due diligence obligatory. Cancellation of sale refused considering purchaser&#039;s investments, appellant&#039;s delayed objections. Additional amount imposed on purchaser to balance equities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2024 08:30:27 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2024 08:30:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Insolvency sale upheld despite allegations, purchaser&#039;s delay condoned with additional payment.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81277</link>
      <description>Liquidator&#039;s discretion in fixing reserve price upheld. COVID-19 lockdown considered valid reason for extension to deposit balance sale consideration. Allegation of undervaluation rejected as appellant failed to bring higher bidders despite opportunities. Non-constitution of Stakeholders&#039; Consultation Committee not violative due to clarificatory explanation. Regulation 33 considered directory, Adjudicating Authority&#039;s extension of time justified under extraordinary circumstances. Attachment order no ground to deny balance payment, purchaser&#039;s due diligence obligatory. Cancellation of sale refused considering purchaser&#039;s investments, appellant&#039;s delayed objections. Additional amount imposed on purchaser to balance equities.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2024 08:30:27 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>