<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 618 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758374</link>
    <description>CESTAT Ahmedabad held that service recipient cannot be demanded to pay service tax on 75% of taxable value for manpower supply services when service provider has already paid service tax on 100% of the service value. The tribunal ruled that service tax cannot be demanded twice on the same activity and value, as it would constitute unjust enrichment to the government, which is impermissible in law. Since the entire service tax liability was already discharged by the service provider, no further demand could be recovered from the appellant service recipient. The impugned order was set aside and appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2024 08:30:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767809" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 618 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758374</link>
      <description>CESTAT Ahmedabad held that service recipient cannot be demanded to pay service tax on 75% of taxable value for manpower supply services when service provider has already paid service tax on 100% of the service value. The tribunal ruled that service tax cannot be demanded twice on the same activity and value, as it would constitute unjust enrichment to the government, which is impermissible in law. Since the entire service tax liability was already discharged by the service provider, no further demand could be recovered from the appellant service recipient. The impugned order was set aside and appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758374</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>