<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 613 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758369</link>
    <description>The CESTAT Ahmedabad held that excise duty cannot be demanded on exported goods despite procedural lapses in export procedures. The appellant exported goods without proper bond/letter of undertaking as required under notification procedures. The tribunal ruled that once goods are admittedly exported, no duty is demandable regardless of procedural non-compliance. The appellant was entitled to SSI exemption up to Rs. 1.5 crores on exported goods valued at Rs. 2.01 crores. The demand was also time-barred as the show cause notice was issued beyond the limitation period, with no suppression of facts established given the appellant&#039;s detailed disclosure of export documents and declarations. Appeal was allowed on both merit and limitation grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2024 08:29:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 613 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758369</link>
      <description>The CESTAT Ahmedabad held that excise duty cannot be demanded on exported goods despite procedural lapses in export procedures. The appellant exported goods without proper bond/letter of undertaking as required under notification procedures. The tribunal ruled that once goods are admittedly exported, no duty is demandable regardless of procedural non-compliance. The appellant was entitled to SSI exemption up to Rs. 1.5 crores on exported goods valued at Rs. 2.01 crores. The demand was also time-barred as the show cause notice was issued beyond the limitation period, with no suppression of facts established given the appellant&#039;s detailed disclosure of export documents and declarations. Appeal was allowed on both merit and limitation grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758369</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>