https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758365 The SC held that the appellant/plaintiff, as the established lawful owner of the suit property, was entitled to receive the full compensation amount for land acquired for the Metro Rail Project. The HC's judgment granting 30% compensation to private defendants was set aside due to lack of pleadings, evidence, and submissions regarding their entitlement to compensation. No claims for compensation had been projected by the defendants before any competent authority, and the HC's ownership findings in favor of the appellant had attained finality without challenge. en-us Wed, 11 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:26:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758365 The SC held that the appellant/plaintiff, as the established lawful owner of the suit property, was entitled to receive the full compensation amount for land acquired for the Metro Rail Project. The HC's judgment granting 30% compensation to private defendants was set aside due to lack of pleadings, evidence, and submissions regarding their entitlement to compensation. No claims for compensation had been projected by the defendants before any competent authority, and the HC's ownership findings in favor of the appellant had attained finality without challenge. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 11 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758365