https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457260 The Bombay HC Nagpur Bench dismissed a writ petition challenging extension of bid submission deadline for coal transportation tender. The Court held that territorial jurisdiction lay with Mumbai, not Nagpur, as the tender process was conducted from respondent's Mumbai Head Office. Despite petitioner downloading tender documents from Nagpur and coal transportation occurring within Nagpur's territorial limits, no part of cause of action arose at Nagpur. The Court emphasized that only facts with nexus to the dispute establish cause of action for territorial jurisdiction, disposing of the petition without entertaining it on merits. en-us Thu, 16 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:27:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457260 The Bombay HC Nagpur Bench dismissed a writ petition challenging extension of bid submission deadline for coal transportation tender. The Court held that territorial jurisdiction lay with Mumbai, not Nagpur, as the tender process was conducted from respondent's Mumbai Head Office. Despite petitioner downloading tender documents from Nagpur and coal transportation occurring within Nagpur's territorial limits, no part of cause of action arose at Nagpur. The Court emphasized that only facts with nexus to the dispute establish cause of action for territorial jurisdiction, disposing of the petition without entertaining it on merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 16 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457260