<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1539 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457236</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the ITAT&#039;s order on section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment years 2012-13 to 2014-15. The court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision that section 2(22)(e) did not apply to loans repaid with interest within the same year, referencing a prior judgment. The application to recall the order condoning delay in filing the appeal was also dismissed, as the legal question had been previously addressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:11:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767775" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1539 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457236</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the ITAT&#039;s order on section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment years 2012-13 to 2014-15. The court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision that section 2(22)(e) did not apply to loans repaid with interest within the same year, referencing a prior judgment. The application to recall the order condoning delay in filing the appeal was also dismissed, as the legal question had been previously addressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>