<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1544 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457241</link>
    <description>A secured creditor seeking assistance under Section 14(1) of SARFAESI must make full and fair disclosure of all material pending proceedings and orders before the District Magistrate. Where the civil suit, orders passed in that suit, and an appellate order protecting possession except through due process of law were not disclosed, the omission deprived the Magistrate of material facts needed for a lawful decision and amounted to a serious procedural infraction and breach of natural justice. On that basis, the non-disclosure vitiated the Section 14(1) order, the writ and District Magistrate&#039;s orders were set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration after disclosure and hearing both sides.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:11:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767770" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1544 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457241</link>
      <description>A secured creditor seeking assistance under Section 14(1) of SARFAESI must make full and fair disclosure of all material pending proceedings and orders before the District Magistrate. Where the civil suit, orders passed in that suit, and an appellate order protecting possession except through due process of law were not disclosed, the omission deprived the Magistrate of material facts needed for a lawful decision and amounted to a serious procedural infraction and breach of natural justice. On that basis, the non-disclosure vitiated the Section 14(1) order, the writ and District Magistrate&#039;s orders were set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration after disclosure and hearing both sides.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457241</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>