<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (4) TMI 17 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38231</link>
    <description>Section 185(5) confers discretionary power on the Income-tax Officer, and an appellate authority may independently reappreciate the matter and substitute its own discretion. Where the Tribunal has done so, a question on whether the Income-tax Officer exercised that discretion properly does not arise from the Tribunal&#039;s order for reference. The Tribunal&#039;s conclusion will nevertheless be sustained if supported by relevant material, including procedural facts such as notices issued, assessment completed within a short period, and other surrounding circumstances showing that refusal to register the firm was not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 11:11:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76777" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (4) TMI 17 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38231</link>
      <description>Section 185(5) confers discretionary power on the Income-tax Officer, and an appellate authority may independently reappreciate the matter and substitute its own discretion. Where the Tribunal has done so, a question on whether the Income-tax Officer exercised that discretion properly does not arise from the Tribunal&#039;s order for reference. The Tribunal&#039;s conclusion will nevertheless be sustained if supported by relevant material, including procedural facts such as notices issued, assessment completed within a short period, and other surrounding circumstances showing that refusal to register the firm was not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>