<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1546 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457243</link>
    <description>The HC of Calcutta dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the ITAT&#039;s decision that reassessment proceedings under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, were not legally initiated. The Court found no failure by the assessee to disclose material facts, concluding the reassessment was based on a change of opinion, not new information. Consequently, the application for stay was also closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:11:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1546 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457243</link>
      <description>The HC of Calcutta dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the ITAT&#039;s decision that reassessment proceedings under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, were not legally initiated. The Court found no failure by the assessee to disclose material facts, concluding the reassessment was based on a change of opinion, not new information. Consequently, the application for stay was also closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457243</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>