https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457254 The Court confined the operative effect of its earlier judgment to the directions summarised in paragraph 81 and clarified that it did not create a universal mandate for personal hearing beyond those directions. It also declined to grant prospective effect in the present order, leaving the State Bank of India free to seek that relief through a separate review petition. The Miscellaneous Application and any pending applications were then disposed of, bringing the interlocutory proceedings to an end. en-us Fri, 12 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Sep 2024 13:20:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457254 The Court confined the operative effect of its earlier judgment to the directions summarised in paragraph 81 and clarified that it did not create a universal mandate for personal hearing beyond those directions. It also declined to grant prospective effect in the present order, leaving the State Bank of India free to seek that relief through a separate review petition. The Miscellaneous Application and any pending applications were then disposed of, bringing the interlocutory proceedings to an end. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 12 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457254