https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457256 The amended Calcutta University statute continued to vest appointment power in the Chancellor, while the reappointment provision only made an incumbent eligible for a further term subject to specified conditions. The deletion of language linking reappointment to the full fresh selection process did not shift the appointing authority to the State Government, and the vacancy-filling provision was not applicable to reappointment. The removal of difficulty power could not be used to bypass the statutory mechanism or alter the Act's substance, and the binding UGC Regulations likewise required appointment by the Visitor/Chancellor. A re-appointment made by the State Government was therefore without authority of law. en-us Tue, 11 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:11:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457256 The amended Calcutta University statute continued to vest appointment power in the Chancellor, while the reappointment provision only made an incumbent eligible for a further term subject to specified conditions. The deletion of language linking reappointment to the full fresh selection process did not shift the appointing authority to the State Government, and the vacancy-filling provision was not applicable to reappointment. The removal of difficulty power could not be used to bypass the statutory mechanism or alter the Act's substance, and the binding UGC Regulations likewise required appointment by the Visitor/Chancellor. A re-appointment made by the State Government was therefore without authority of law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 11 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457256