<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 1622 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457218</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the writ appeal, affirming the Single Judge&#039;s decision to relegate the petitioner to pursue an alternative remedy. Despite the writ petition&#039;s admission, the Court found no error in directing the petitioner to seek an alternative remedy, given the dispute&#039;s nature. Consequently, respondent No. 1 was reinstated to her position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:53:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 1622 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457218</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the writ appeal, affirming the Single Judge&#039;s decision to relegate the petitioner to pursue an alternative remedy. Despite the writ petition&#039;s admission, the Court found no error in directing the petitioner to seek an alternative remedy, given the dispute&#039;s nature. Consequently, respondent No. 1 was reinstated to her position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457218</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>