<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 605 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758361</link>
    <description>Cash seized during a search under section 67(2) was treated as not retained lawfully where the respondents accepted that it had been kept in fixed deposit and did not dispute reliance on earlier authority that such seizure was without authority of law. The seized amount was directed to be remitted to the petitioner&#039;s bank account together with accrued interest, reflecting the operative treatment of unlawfully seized cash and the return of the amount with interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 19:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767700" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 605 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758361</link>
      <description>Cash seized during a search under section 67(2) was treated as not retained lawfully where the respondents accepted that it had been kept in fixed deposit and did not dispute reliance on earlier authority that such seizure was without authority of law. The seized amount was directed to be remitted to the petitioner&#039;s bank account together with accrued interest, reflecting the operative treatment of unlawfully seized cash and the return of the amount with interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>