<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 600 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758356</link>
    <description>HC partially upheld petitioner&#039;s challenge to GST assessment order for 2017-2018. Court quashed the original order, directing petitioner to deposit 10% of disputed tax and file detailed reply. Respondents were instructed to reconsider assessment with specific conditions. Writ petition was disposed of without imposing costs, providing an opportunity for reassessment while maintaining procedural fairness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 21:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767691" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 600 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758356</link>
      <description>HC partially upheld petitioner&#039;s challenge to GST assessment order for 2017-2018. Court quashed the original order, directing petitioner to deposit 10% of disputed tax and file detailed reply. Respondents were instructed to reconsider assessment with specific conditions. Writ petition was disposed of without imposing costs, providing an opportunity for reassessment while maintaining procedural fairness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>