<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 597 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758353</link>
    <description>HC allowed Writ Petitions challenging GST assessment orders for two assessment years. Despite time bar arguments, court quashed impugned orders and remitted cases back to respondent for fresh consideration. Petitioner directed to file consolidated reply within 30 days, and respondent instructed to pass fresh orders within two months, ensuring fair hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 May 2025 23:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 597 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758353</link>
      <description>HC allowed Writ Petitions challenging GST assessment orders for two assessment years. Despite time bar arguments, court quashed impugned orders and remitted cases back to respondent for fresh consideration. Petitioner directed to file consolidated reply within 30 days, and respondent instructed to pass fresh orders within two months, ensuring fair hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>