<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 592 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758348</link>
    <description>Writ interference was declined at the show cause notice stage under the Odisha GST regime because the dispute concerned the ingredients and raw material usage in fly ash bricks, which could be raised before the adjudicating authority in reply. The Court held that it should not examine the merits or correctness of the tax demand at the notice stage and left the petitioner to pursue objections, including any request for verification, in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 May 2025 23:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 592 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758348</link>
      <description>Writ interference was declined at the show cause notice stage under the Odisha GST regime because the dispute concerned the ingredients and raw material usage in fly ash bricks, which could be raised before the adjudicating authority in reply. The Court held that it should not examine the merits or correctness of the tax demand at the notice stage and left the petitioner to pursue objections, including any request for verification, in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>