<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 566 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758322</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, affirming that the advanced amount was not a financial debt but an investment for a joint development project. The Tribunal found no evidence in financial statements treating the amount as a loan. Consequently, the application for a refund was rejected, and the appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:21:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 566 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758322</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, affirming that the advanced amount was not a financial debt but an investment for a joint development project. The Tribunal found no evidence in financial statements treating the amount as a loan. Consequently, the application for a refund was rejected, and the appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>