<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 546 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758302</link>
    <description>The SC determined that per Section 72(2) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, issuing a show-cause notice is mandatory before any penalty imposition, which is not automatic. The suo moto revision under Section 64 was unnecessary. The HC&#039;s decision to annul the Joint Commissioner&#039;s order was affirmed, and the SLP was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 20:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 546 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758302</link>
      <description>The SC determined that per Section 72(2) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, issuing a show-cause notice is mandatory before any penalty imposition, which is not automatic. The suo moto revision under Section 64 was unnecessary. The HC&#039;s decision to annul the Joint Commissioner&#039;s order was affirmed, and the SLP was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>