<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 1177 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457212</link>
    <description>Bail under the Prevention of Money-laundering Act remains subject to the statutory twin conditions, assessed on a prima facie reading of the material. The Court noted allegations of illegal mining, routing of cash proceeds, use of bank accounts in the principal accused&#039;s name, and concealment and projection of tainted money as untainted property, treating money-laundering as an independent and continuing offence. It also recognised the statutory presumption regarding proceeds of crime and the evidentiary value of inquiry statements. Parity with a co-accused is unavailable unless the factual matrix is identical or substantially similar; where the accused&#039;s role is materially different, negative equality cannot be claimed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2024 14:38:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767593" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 1177 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457212</link>
      <description>Bail under the Prevention of Money-laundering Act remains subject to the statutory twin conditions, assessed on a prima facie reading of the material. The Court noted allegations of illegal mining, routing of cash proceeds, use of bank accounts in the principal accused&#039;s name, and concealment and projection of tainted money as untainted property, treating money-laundering as an independent and continuing offence. It also recognised the statutory presumption regarding proceeds of crime and the evidentiary value of inquiry statements. Parity with a co-accused is unavailable unless the factual matrix is identical or substantially similar; where the accused&#039;s role is materially different, negative equality cannot be claimed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>