<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 1541 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457200</link>
    <description>Stigmatic adverse remarks affecting a professional&#039;s reputation cannot be sustained where they are recorded without supplying the material relied upon or giving a meaningful opportunity to explain. The de-empanelment communication was therefore not sustainable and the adverse observations were expunged. A show-cause notice proposing caution-list inclusion is also invalid where it reflects a concluded finding of gross negligence and fraud before hearing, making the proposed hearing an empty formality. On the stated facts, the notice was quashed, while the authority was left free to proceed afresh in accordance with law after following due process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 09:46:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767584" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 1541 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457200</link>
      <description>Stigmatic adverse remarks affecting a professional&#039;s reputation cannot be sustained where they are recorded without supplying the material relied upon or giving a meaningful opportunity to explain. The de-empanelment communication was therefore not sustainable and the adverse observations were expunged. A show-cause notice proposing caution-list inclusion is also invalid where it reflects a concluded finding of gross negligence and fraud before hearing, making the proposed hearing an empty formality. On the stated facts, the notice was quashed, while the authority was left free to proceed afresh in accordance with law after following due process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>