<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 539 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758295</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the petitioner&#039;s refund claim for tax paid on reverse charge basis on ocean freight with interest. The court held that despite earlier litigation directing refund, the petitioner was not entitled to relief as the tax payment was revenue neutral - the amount paid would have been availed as Input Tax Credit and utilized. The court found the petitioner was taking undue advantage of court proceedings without suffering actual prejudice, noting only importers who bore IGST on ocean freight charges without liability would be prejudiced. The petition was dismissed with no interference warranted in the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 21:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 539 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758295</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the petitioner&#039;s refund claim for tax paid on reverse charge basis on ocean freight with interest. The court held that despite earlier litigation directing refund, the petitioner was not entitled to relief as the tax payment was revenue neutral - the amount paid would have been availed as Input Tax Credit and utilized. The court found the petitioner was taking undue advantage of court proceedings without suffering actual prejudice, noting only importers who bore IGST on ocean freight charges without liability would be prejudiced. The petition was dismissed with no interference warranted in the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>