<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 538 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758294</link>
    <description>HC found the GST department&#039;s order under Section 73 unsustainable. The order dismissing petitioner&#039;s reply was cryptic and did not adequately consider submitted documents. The court set aside the impugned order, remitted the show cause notice for re-adjudication, and directed the Proper Officer to conduct a fresh hearing within prescribed timelines, granting petitioner 30 days to file a detailed response.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 May 2025 23:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 538 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758294</link>
      <description>HC found the GST department&#039;s order under Section 73 unsustainable. The order dismissing petitioner&#039;s reply was cryptic and did not adequately consider submitted documents. The court set aside the impugned order, remitted the show cause notice for re-adjudication, and directed the Proper Officer to conduct a fresh hearing within prescribed timelines, granting petitioner 30 days to file a detailed response.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>