<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 536 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758292</link>
    <description>A provisional attachment of a bank account under Section 83 of the CGST Act ceases after one year from the attachment order unless a fresh attachment order is issued. Here, the original attachment was dated 27.01.2022 and no subsequent order was made, so the embargo could not continue on the basis of the expired order. The bank account was therefore directed to be allowed to operate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 May 2025 23:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767562" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 536 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758292</link>
      <description>A provisional attachment of a bank account under Section 83 of the CGST Act ceases after one year from the attachment order unless a fresh attachment order is issued. Here, the original attachment was dated 27.01.2022 and no subsequent order was made, so the embargo could not continue on the basis of the expired order. The bank account was therefore directed to be allowed to operate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758292</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>