<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (4) TMI 94 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38207</link>
    <description>The court held that the Income-tax Officer lacked jurisdiction to issue a second notice for reassessment on items previously annulled by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and upheld by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. The court deemed the second notice invalid as it mirrored grounds from the annulled first reassessment, emphasizing that a final judicial determination is binding. Additionally, the court found the Commissioner&#039;s sanction for the second notice lacking proper consideration, concluding that the Income-tax Officer acted without jurisdiction. The writ petition was allowed, quashing the notice and restraining further proceedings, with costs awarded to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 17:30:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (4) TMI 94 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38207</link>
      <description>The court held that the Income-tax Officer lacked jurisdiction to issue a second notice for reassessment on items previously annulled by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and upheld by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. The court deemed the second notice invalid as it mirrored grounds from the annulled first reassessment, emphasizing that a final judicial determination is binding. Additionally, the court found the Commissioner&#039;s sanction for the second notice lacking proper consideration, concluding that the Income-tax Officer acted without jurisdiction. The writ petition was allowed, quashing the notice and restraining further proceedings, with costs awarded to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>