https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81230 The High Court examined the validity of reopening assessments based on the report of the District Valuation Officer (DVO). It distinguished between "reason to believe" and "mere suspicion" as grounds for reopening. The court held that the proximity of reasons to the belief of income escaping assessment is determinative. Absence of reasons would render it a mere suspicion, which is insufficient for reopening. The Assessing Officer solely relied on the DVO's valuation estimate of renovation/reconstruction costs, despite the assessee declaring the property's cost under "Fixed Assets and Capital WIP." The reasons did not reflect the AO's application of mind to ascertain whether the assessee had already declared the property's value correctly. F..... en-us Wed, 11 Sep 2024 09:07:16 +0530 Wed, 11 Sep 2024 09:07:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81230 The High Court examined the validity of reopening assessments based on the report of the District Valuation Officer (DVO). It distinguished between "reason to believe" and "mere suspicion" as grounds for reopening. The court held that the proximity of reasons to the belief of income escaping assessment is determinative. Absence of reasons would render it a mere suspicion, which is insufficient for reopening. The Assessing Officer solely relied on the DVO's valuation estimate of renovation/reconstruction costs, despite the assessee declaring the property's cost under "Fixed Assets and Capital WIP." The reasons did not reflect the AO's application of mind to ascertain whether the assessee had already declared the property's value correctly. F..... Highlights Income Tax Wed, 11 Sep 2024 09:07:16 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81230