<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 526 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758282</link>
    <description>A prima facie jurisdictional concern arose because the show-cause notice was issued by the Assistant Commissioner, while the final adjudication order was passed by the Deputy Commissioner who had not heard the petitioner. On that basis, interim protection was granted by staying the impugned order, and the matter was posted for further hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 09:07:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 526 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758282</link>
      <description>A prima facie jurisdictional concern arose because the show-cause notice was issued by the Assistant Commissioner, while the final adjudication order was passed by the Deputy Commissioner who had not heard the petitioner. On that basis, interim protection was granted by staying the impugned order, and the matter was posted for further hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758282</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>