<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 523 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758279</link>
    <description>Article 4 of the India-USA DTAA was applied to determine whether a fiscally transparent US LLC could claim treaty benefits and be treated as a resident liable to tax in the United States. The Tribunal considered that liability to tax may arise through domicile, residence, incorporation, or a similar criterion, and that a single-member LLC can still have sufficient taxable nexus through its owner. Relying on the tax residency certificate and US tax classification materials, it found that actual tax payment by the entity itself was not decisive. The treaty&#039;s treatment of fiscally transparent entities and the partnership clause supported eligibility where income is taxed in the residence State directly or through the owner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 11:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 523 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758279</link>
      <description>Article 4 of the India-USA DTAA was applied to determine whether a fiscally transparent US LLC could claim treaty benefits and be treated as a resident liable to tax in the United States. The Tribunal considered that liability to tax may arise through domicile, residence, incorporation, or a similar criterion, and that a single-member LLC can still have sufficient taxable nexus through its owner. Relying on the tax residency certificate and US tax classification materials, it found that actual tax payment by the entity itself was not decisive. The treaty&#039;s treatment of fiscally transparent entities and the partnership clause supported eligibility where income is taxed in the residence State directly or through the owner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>