https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758268 The Madras HC allowed a writ petition regarding MEIS benefits under Foreign Trade Policy Chapter 3. The petitioner exported fruit pulp and mango puree, eligible products under MEIS, and also claimed duty drawback under Section 75 of Customs Act, 1975. The court found no dispute regarding actual exports or parallel incentives denial. Since legitimate exports cannot be denied and no material suggested the petitioner was otherwise dis-entitled, the court directed respondents to amend shipping bills enabling MEIS benefit claims. The incentives were granted without prejudice to the Department's recovery rights if discrepancies are later discovered. en-us Thu, 08 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Sep 2024 09:06:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758268 The Madras HC allowed a writ petition regarding MEIS benefits under Foreign Trade Policy Chapter 3. The petitioner exported fruit pulp and mango puree, eligible products under MEIS, and also claimed duty drawback under Section 75 of Customs Act, 1975. The court found no dispute regarding actual exports or parallel incentives denial. Since legitimate exports cannot be denied and no material suggested the petitioner was otherwise dis-entitled, the court directed respondents to amend shipping bills enabling MEIS benefit claims. The incentives were granted without prejudice to the Department's recovery rights if discrepancies are later discovered. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 08 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758268