<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Upholds Insolvency Board&#039;s Decision to Suspend Professional for Misconduct; Rejects Claims of Improper Procedure.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81216</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the order of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) suspending the registration of the petitioner as an Insolvency Professional for two years. The court held that the contention of the petitioner regarding the improper constitution of the Disciplinary Committee was untenable. The IBBI was within its authority to investigate and take action against the petitioner for misconduct, irrespective of separate proceedings before the Adjudicating Authority. The material on record showed the petitioner&#039;s failure to preserve the assets, hand over records to the liquidator, and prevent unauthorized transfers, violating provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) and regulations. .....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 09:06:30 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 09:06:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767465" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Upholds Insolvency Board&#039;s Decision to Suspend Professional for Misconduct; Rejects Claims of Improper Procedure.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81216</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the order of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) suspending the registration of the petitioner as an Insolvency Professional for two years. The court held that the contention of the petitioner regarding the improper constitution of the Disciplinary Committee was untenable. The IBBI was within its authority to investigate and take action against the petitioner for misconduct, irrespective of separate proceedings before the Adjudicating Authority. The material on record showed the petitioner&#039;s failure to preserve the assets, hand over records to the liquidator, and prevent unauthorized transfers, violating provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) and regulations. .....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 09:06:30 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>