<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (8) TMI 313 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457178</link>
    <description>The SC allowed the appeal, overturning the HC&#039;s judgment, and reinstated the Labour Court&#039;s award, which had ordered the reinstatement of a probationary Bus Conductor with full back wages. The SC emphasized that the HC erred by overstepping its jurisdiction under Article 226, which should not function as an appellate authority over specialized Tribunals. The SC highlighted the importance of respecting the Labour Court&#039;s jurisdiction, as the existence of a conciliation proceeding justified the industrial dispute. The decision reinforced the principle that judicial review under Article 226 must be exercised with caution to uphold justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 11:17:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767422" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (8) TMI 313 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457178</link>
      <description>The SC allowed the appeal, overturning the HC&#039;s judgment, and reinstated the Labour Court&#039;s award, which had ordered the reinstatement of a probationary Bus Conductor with full back wages. The SC emphasized that the HC erred by overstepping its jurisdiction under Article 226, which should not function as an appellate authority over specialized Tribunals. The SC highlighted the importance of respecting the Labour Court&#039;s jurisdiction, as the existence of a conciliation proceeding justified the industrial dispute. The decision reinforced the principle that judicial review under Article 226 must be exercised with caution to uphold justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457178</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>