https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457176 The court upheld the Labour Court's decision, affirming that the canteen workers were not employees of the establishment but of the contractor. The court emphasized that the establishment's obligation under Section 46 of the Factories Act, 1948, did not automatically confer employee status without proven administrative control. The High Court's judgment was deemed appropriate, and the appeal was dismissed, underscoring the necessity of demonstrating administrative control to establish employment status in such disputes. en-us Mon, 26 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Sep 2024 11:14:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457176 The court upheld the Labour Court's decision, affirming that the canteen workers were not employees of the establishment but of the contractor. The court emphasized that the establishment's obligation under Section 46 of the Factories Act, 1948, did not automatically confer employee status without proven administrative control. The High Court's judgment was deemed appropriate, and the appeal was dismissed, underscoring the necessity of demonstrating administrative control to establish employment status in such disputes. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 26 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457176