<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 503 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758259</link>
    <description>HC dismissed writ petition challenging tax penalty order. Court found petitioner was provided proper hearing opportunity and penalty orders were valid for separate months and transactions. Standing Counsel successfully demonstrated that principles of natural justice were followed, and individual assessment of tax violations was appropriate under CGST Act provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 19:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767401" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 503 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758259</link>
      <description>HC dismissed writ petition challenging tax penalty order. Court found petitioner was provided proper hearing opportunity and penalty orders were valid for separate months and transactions. Standing Counsel successfully demonstrated that principles of natural justice were followed, and individual assessment of tax violations was appropriate under CGST Act provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>