https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81208 The petitioner challenged the order and summary order alleging discrepancies between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, and excess availment of Input Tax Credit (ITC). The petitioner agreed to pay 10% of the disputed tax to file reply/objections with supporting documents. The High Court set aside the impugned orders and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, subject to the petitioner paying 10% of the disputed tax within four weeks. The petition was disposed of by way of remand. en-us Tue, 10 Sep 2024 08:12:33 +0530 Tue, 10 Sep 2024 08:12:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81208 The petitioner challenged the order and summary order alleging discrepancies between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, and excess availment of Input Tax Credit (ITC). The petitioner agreed to pay 10% of the disputed tax to file reply/objections with supporting documents. The High Court set aside the impugned orders and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, subject to the petitioner paying 10% of the disputed tax within four weeks. The petition was disposed of by way of remand. Highlights GST Tue, 10 Sep 2024 08:12:33 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81208