<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 493 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758249</link>
    <description>GST assessment orders passed without giving the affected taxpayer an effective opportunity to respond to portal-uploaded notices were held liable to be interfered with. The Madras HC found that the absence of a proper hearing vitiated the assessments, so the impugned orders were quashed and the disputes were remitted for fresh consideration on merits. The authority was directed to hear the taxpayer and consider her reply before passing fresh orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 May 2025 23:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 493 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758249</link>
      <description>GST assessment orders passed without giving the affected taxpayer an effective opportunity to respond to portal-uploaded notices were held liable to be interfered with. The Madras HC found that the absence of a proper hearing vitiated the assessments, so the impugned orders were quashed and the disputes were remitted for fresh consideration on merits. The authority was directed to hear the taxpayer and consider her reply before passing fresh orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>