<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 491 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758247</link>
    <description>HC Madras set aside tax demand order due to insufficient notice. Petitioner was unaware of proceedings as notices were only uploaded on GST portal. Court remanded matter for reconsideration, requiring petitioner to reply to show cause notice within two weeks. Respondent must provide personal hearing and issue fresh order within three months. Garnishee order was set aside, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 May 2025 23:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 491 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758247</link>
      <description>HC Madras set aside tax demand order due to insufficient notice. Petitioner was unaware of proceedings as notices were only uploaded on GST portal. Court remanded matter for reconsideration, requiring petitioner to reply to show cause notice within two weeks. Respondent must provide personal hearing and issue fresh order within three months. Garnishee order was set aside, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>