<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 480 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758236</link>
    <description>ITAT Chennai quashed CIT&#039;s revision order under section 263. During search operations, cash and jewellery were seized from assessee who provided sworn statement and offered additional business income of Rs. 70.60 lakhs to cover shortfall. AO accepted the explanation after due inquiry. ITAT held that AO took plausible view with proper application of mind, and CIT cannot invoke revisional powers merely because of different opinion. Appeal allowed in favor of assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2024 14:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 480 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758236</link>
      <description>ITAT Chennai quashed CIT&#039;s revision order under section 263. During search operations, cash and jewellery were seized from assessee who provided sworn statement and offered additional business income of Rs. 70.60 lakhs to cover shortfall. AO accepted the explanation after due inquiry. ITAT held that AO took plausible view with proper application of mind, and CIT cannot invoke revisional powers merely because of different opinion. Appeal allowed in favor of assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>