<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 474 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758230</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 2,62,50,000/- as cash credit under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal upheld that the capital introduced by partners should be scrutinized in their individual hands, not the partnership firm, citing jurisdictional High Court precedents. The Revenue failed to provide contrary evidence, leading to the dismissal of their appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2024 10:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767359" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 474 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758230</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 2,62,50,000/- as cash credit under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal upheld that the capital introduced by partners should be scrutinized in their individual hands, not the partnership firm, citing jurisdictional High Court precedents. The Revenue failed to provide contrary evidence, leading to the dismissal of their appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758230</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>