<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 469 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758225</link>
    <description>CESTAT Kolkata upheld reduced redemption fine and penalty for importation of green peas and yellow peas during October-December 2018. The appellant challenged notification extending import restrictions beyond June 2018, with HC Rajasthan initially staying the notification before SC upheld its validity. Tribunal took sympathetic view considering three-month gap in restrictions, appellant&#039;s status as regular importer, and successful challenge of extension notification. Despite goods being restricted per SC ruling, circumstances warranted reduced penalties. Revenue appeal and respondent&#039;s cross-objection were disposed of with reduced fines maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 08:11:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767351" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 469 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758225</link>
      <description>CESTAT Kolkata upheld reduced redemption fine and penalty for importation of green peas and yellow peas during October-December 2018. The appellant challenged notification extending import restrictions beyond June 2018, with HC Rajasthan initially staying the notification before SC upheld its validity. Tribunal took sympathetic view considering three-month gap in restrictions, appellant&#039;s status as regular importer, and successful challenge of extension notification. Despite goods being restricted per SC ruling, circumstances warranted reduced penalties. Revenue appeal and respondent&#039;s cross-objection were disposed of with reduced fines maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758225</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>