<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (12) TMI 19 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38189</link>
    <description>For wealth-tax purposes, amounts transferred to contingency reserve, development reserve and tariffs and dividends control reserve remained part of the company&#039;s assets because restrictions on use did not divest ownership, so they were includible in net wealth. The consumers&#039; benefit account was also includible, as it continued to form part of the company&#039;s profits and no enforceable debt in favour of consumers was shown. By contrast, provisions for income-tax, super-tax and wealth-tax liabilities were deductible as present debts owed on the valuation date. The portion of net wealth attributable to Trombay Units Nos. 2 and 3 and the Carnac receiving station qualified for exemption under section 5(1)(xxi), as the units were treated as newly set up and ready to commence operations after the relevant date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 16:17:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (12) TMI 19 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38189</link>
      <description>For wealth-tax purposes, amounts transferred to contingency reserve, development reserve and tariffs and dividends control reserve remained part of the company&#039;s assets because restrictions on use did not divest ownership, so they were includible in net wealth. The consumers&#039; benefit account was also includible, as it continued to form part of the company&#039;s profits and no enforceable debt in favour of consumers was shown. By contrast, provisions for income-tax, super-tax and wealth-tax liabilities were deductible as present debts owed on the valuation date. The portion of net wealth attributable to Trombay Units Nos. 2 and 3 and the Carnac receiving station qualified for exemption under section 5(1)(xxi), as the units were treated as newly set up and ready to commence operations after the relevant date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>