https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758224 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, upholding the Appellate Authority's decision to reduce the redemption fine and penalty on the import of old and used worn clothing. Confiscation under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act was justified due to the absence of the required license. The Tribunal found no infirmity in the impugned order and deemed the reduced penalties sufficient to meet the ends of justice, relying on legal interpretations of the Customs Act, Foreign Trade Policy, and relevant case law. en-us Mon, 02 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Sep 2024 08:11:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758224 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, upholding the Appellate Authority's decision to reduce the redemption fine and penalty on the import of old and used worn clothing. Confiscation under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act was justified due to the absence of the required license. The Tribunal found no infirmity in the impugned order and deemed the reduced penalties sufficient to meet the ends of justice, relying on legal interpretations of the Customs Act, Foreign Trade Policy, and relevant case law. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 02 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758224