<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 467 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758223</link>
    <description>Interim permission to travel abroad and suspension of a lookout circular were refused because the applicant did not show a cogent, justified necessity for travel. The stated reason of meeting family members was insufficient where no barrier prevented relatives from visiting India, and the claimed need to attend a son&#039;s admission process was unsupported by adequate material. The challenge to the lookout circular was left for decision in the main petition, but the interim application had to succeed on its own merits. On the materials before the Court, the ongoing investigation and the reasons recorded by the Special Judge were not displaced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 08:11:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767348" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 467 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758223</link>
      <description>Interim permission to travel abroad and suspension of a lookout circular were refused because the applicant did not show a cogent, justified necessity for travel. The stated reason of meeting family members was insufficient where no barrier prevented relatives from visiting India, and the claimed need to attend a son&#039;s admission process was unsupported by adequate material. The challenge to the lookout circular was left for decision in the main petition, but the interim application had to succeed on its own merits. On the materials before the Court, the ongoing investigation and the reasons recorded by the Special Judge were not displaced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>