<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cheque dishonor case acquittal upheld - plausible defense of investment, not loan. Petitioner failed to prove Rs.14L loan claim.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81194</link>
    <description>Dishonor of cheque case - accused acquitted - rebuttal of presumption u/ss 118 and 139 of NI Act. Appellate Court has wide powers to re-appreciate evidence in appeal against acquittal but must exercise caution as presumption of innocence strengthened by acquittal order. Supreme Court guidelines on appeals against acquittal followed. Respondent&#039;s defense found plausible - cheque given for investment, not loan. Petitioner failed to substantiate Rs. 14 lacs loan claim. Presumption u/s 114 Evidence Act applied against Petitioner for non-production of accounts. No infirmity found in Appellate Court&#039;s findings based on preponderance of probabilities. Leave to appeal dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 08:10:47 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 08:10:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767329" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Cheque dishonor case acquittal upheld - plausible defense of investment, not loan. Petitioner failed to prove Rs.14L loan claim.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81194</link>
      <description>Dishonor of cheque case - accused acquitted - rebuttal of presumption u/ss 118 and 139 of NI Act. Appellate Court has wide powers to re-appreciate evidence in appeal against acquittal but must exercise caution as presumption of innocence strengthened by acquittal order. Supreme Court guidelines on appeals against acquittal followed. Respondent&#039;s defense found plausible - cheque given for investment, not loan. Petitioner failed to substantiate Rs. 14 lacs loan claim. Presumption u/s 114 Evidence Act applied against Petitioner for non-production of accounts. No infirmity found in Appellate Court&#039;s findings based on preponderance of probabilities. Leave to appeal dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 08:10:47 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>