https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457163 The Competition Appellate Tribunal set aside the Competition Commission's order finding the appellant guilty of abusing dominant position under Section 4(2)(c) of the Competition Act, 2002. The Tribunal held that the Commission's findings were legally unsustainable due to violation of natural justice principles. The Commission relied on internet-downloaded information without evidentiary value and failed to provide the appellant adequate opportunity to controvert the evidence. Additionally, the Commission discussed clause 9.1(c)(i) of the media agreement without prior reference in the Section 26(1) order, denying the appellant opportunity to defend. The matter was remitted to the Commission for fresh disposal in accordance with law. en-us Mon, 23 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Sep 2024 20:02:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457163 The Competition Appellate Tribunal set aside the Competition Commission's order finding the appellant guilty of abusing dominant position under Section 4(2)(c) of the Competition Act, 2002. The Tribunal held that the Commission's findings were legally unsustainable due to violation of natural justice principles. The Commission relied on internet-downloaded information without evidentiary value and failed to provide the appellant adequate opportunity to controvert the evidence. Additionally, the Commission discussed clause 9.1(c)(i) of the media agreement without prior reference in the Section 26(1) order, denying the appellant opportunity to defend. The matter was remitted to the Commission for fresh disposal in accordance with law. Case-Laws Law of Competition Mon, 23 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457163