https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457170 Writ petitions filed before the Bombay Bench were held to be not maintainable there because the original respondent in the Tribunal proceedings was the Commissioner, Central Excise at Nagpur, making the Nagpur Bench the proper forum. The Court did not examine the merits and instead permitted the petitioners to withdraw the petitions and refile them before the Nagpur Bench within two weeks. The petitions were disposed of on that basis, no costs were awarded, and all substantive contentions were expressly kept open for determination by the appropriate Bench. en-us Sun, 04 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Sep 2024 20:02:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457170 Writ petitions filed before the Bombay Bench were held to be not maintainable there because the original respondent in the Tribunal proceedings was the Commissioner, Central Excise at Nagpur, making the Nagpur Bench the proper forum. The Court did not examine the merits and instead permitted the petitioners to withdraw the petitions and refile them before the Nagpur Bench within two weeks. The petitions were disposed of on that basis, no costs were awarded, and all substantive contentions were expressly kept open for determination by the appropriate Bench. Case-Laws Central Excise Sun, 04 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457170