<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (11) TMI 9 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38184</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the rectification under section 154 of the Income-tax Act was unwarranted due to the controversial nature of the interpretation of rule 8. The court emphasized that rectification is only appropriate for clear and obvious errors, not for debatable legal issues. The judgment underscored the need for mistakes to be evident and unmistakable for rectification purposes. The assessee was awarded costs amounting to Rs. 200.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 16:08:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (11) TMI 9 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38184</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the rectification under section 154 of the Income-tax Act was unwarranted due to the controversial nature of the interpretation of rule 8. The court emphasized that rectification is only appropriate for clear and obvious errors, not for debatable legal issues. The judgment underscored the need for mistakes to be evident and unmistakable for rectification purposes. The assessee was awarded costs amounting to Rs. 200.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>