https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457161 Withdrawal of support from a ministry headed by a particular Chief Minister did not, by itself, amount to voluntarily giving up membership of the political party under paragraph 2(1)(a) of the Tenth Schedule, where the legislators maintained support for the party. Disqualification proceedings before the Speaker were vitiated because notice was hurried, material was not properly supplied, and the members were denied a fair opportunity to meet the allegations, contrary to natural justice and procedural fairness. The Speaker's finality under the Tenth Schedule did not bar judicial review for constitutional infirmity, mala fides, breach of natural justice, or perversity, and the disqualification order was set aside. en-us Fri, 13 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Sep 2024 16:10:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457161 Withdrawal of support from a ministry headed by a particular Chief Minister did not, by itself, amount to voluntarily giving up membership of the political party under paragraph 2(1)(a) of the Tenth Schedule, where the legislators maintained support for the party. Disqualification proceedings before the Speaker were vitiated because notice was hurried, material was not properly supplied, and the members were denied a fair opportunity to meet the allegations, contrary to natural justice and procedural fairness. The Speaker's finality under the Tenth Schedule did not bar judicial review for constitutional infirmity, mala fides, breach of natural justice, or perversity, and the disqualification order was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457161