<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 1157 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457161</link>
    <description>The SC set aside the Speaker&#039;s order disqualifying the appellants under the Tenth Schedule, along with the High Court&#039;s majority judgment upholding that decision. The SC found violations of procedural rules and principles of natural justice, indicating bias and mala fide actions by the Speaker. The appeals were allowed, emphasizing fairness in disqualification proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2024 16:10:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 1157 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457161</link>
      <description>The SC set aside the Speaker&#039;s order disqualifying the appellants under the Tenth Schedule, along with the High Court&#039;s majority judgment upholding that decision. The SC found violations of procedural rules and principles of natural justice, indicating bias and mala fide actions by the Speaker. The appeals were allowed, emphasizing fairness in disqualification proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457161</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>