<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (8) TMI 571 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457160</link>
    <description>The SC upheld the conviction and death sentence of the appellants, dismissing the appeal. The court found overwhelming evidence against the appellants, ruled that dying declarations were inadmissible as res gestae but could corroborate witness testimony, and deemed the death penalty appropriate due to the crime&#039;s severity and appellants&#039; actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2024 12:32:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767266" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (8) TMI 571 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457160</link>
      <description>The SC upheld the conviction and death sentence of the appellants, dismissing the appeal. The court found overwhelming evidence against the appellants, ruled that dying declarations were inadmissible as res gestae but could corroborate witness testimony, and deemed the death penalty appropriate due to the crime&#039;s severity and appellants&#039; actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457160</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>