<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Losses from Genuine Share Trading Upheld, Expenses Disallowed; Income from Property Sale Addition Confirmed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81185</link>
    <description>Disallowance of losses suffered by the appellant on genuine share trading and direct expenses incurred. The key points are: The reasoning given by the Assessing Officer (AO) in the Assessment Order is based on doubts and suspicion rather than facts. A bona fide business arrangement between sister concerns with a signed agreement, not treated as bogus by authorities, cannot be considered a bogus transaction. Losses incurred have been assessed, but the part recovered from the assessee has been added, despite transactions being recorded in audited books. This view of AO/CIT(A) is unsound and additions are deleted. Disallowance of various expenses is rejected as the share trading business was wrongly held bogus. Addition on account of income fr.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2024 08:30:06 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2024 08:30:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Losses from Genuine Share Trading Upheld, Expenses Disallowed; Income from Property Sale Addition Confirmed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81185</link>
      <description>Disallowance of losses suffered by the appellant on genuine share trading and direct expenses incurred. The key points are: The reasoning given by the Assessing Officer (AO) in the Assessment Order is based on doubts and suspicion rather than facts. A bona fide business arrangement between sister concerns with a signed agreement, not treated as bogus by authorities, cannot be considered a bogus transaction. Losses incurred have been assessed, but the part recovered from the assessee has been added, despite transactions being recorded in audited books. This view of AO/CIT(A) is unsound and additions are deleted. Disallowance of various expenses is rejected as the share trading business was wrongly held bogus. Addition on account of income fr.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2024 08:30:06 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>